WWI Aerial Dog Fighting and a Look Back of the Application of Boyd's Energy Attrition Theories

Colonel Boyd was a famous Air Force fighter pilotFor instance, if we study the Red Baron's tactics,
flying an F-86 and is well known for his work heBaron von Richtoften, we note he had his group
coined as the OODA Loop Theory. OODA Loopengage the enemy and he would swoop in and pick
stands for; Observe, Orient, Decide, Access. This isoff the aircraft at their most vulnerable points. Our
where a pilot must "observe" the enemy, thenThink Tank was discussing this the other night when
"orient" their aircraft, next "decide" to engage andconsidering the future of aerial combat.
then "access" your next move, and do it over andIndeed, as I study nature and how various species
over again during the dog fight until the other pilot isare able to evade predators or how the aggressors
defeated in shot down.position themselves for their prey. It appears that
Now then, it seems that in World War I, beforemany of these techniques are completely adaptable
Colonel Boyd developed his theories of energyto the future of combat with robotic UAVs, MAVs
attrition in dog fighting that these truths were muchand AI control systems.
more apropos. Since WWI aircraft were slow andThe concept of swarming, energy attrition and the
often under powered by today's standards of thruststudy of the very first aerial dogfights to modern
weight ratios, those aces which succeeded in theirday, show how the evolution of aerial combat will
aerial encounters were probably using more ofthrust us into the future. We can learn a lot by
Colonel Boyd's theories than anyone may have everstudying the past and applying it to the future.
known.