What is Productive Communication?

>weather, beauty of surroundings etc. This is a
deep-rooted category of communication found in all
This article introduces a perspective oncultures.
communication, which is a productive and efficientThe subconscious level of communication is far from
one. The article groups types of communicationperfect. Many phenomena crop up in communication
between us humans in a simple and pro-active way.that can appear strange to the outsider. It can
It also states that not communicating is also a wayconsist of two directors not 'hitting it off',
to communicate.misunderstandings when a message is exchanged
"...No matter how hard one tries, one cannot notbetween a manager and a subordinate,
communicate. Activity or inactivity, speech or silence,misunderstanding of the positive intentions proposed
everything has an importance as a means ofby somebody at a meeting, etc. The message being
communication: It has an influence on other people,sent is unlike the message being received. We can
and these other people, in turn, cannot not respondunderstand this better in the following manner: The
to this communication and thereby communicatemessage sender has some notion about what he/she
themselves." Paul Watzlawickwishes to impart. This notion must be expressed in
Communication can be considered as an input factorwords. In the 'translation' from notion to words, a
in relation to productivity. That which is produced byselection has to take place. Otherwise, there will be
the communication should be in accordance with thetoo many words. We can say that part of the notion
organisation's purpose, both quantitatively andis deleted. The content is also changed to a certain
qualitatively. Also, it should not create by-productsextent during the transition from notion to words; it
that conflict with this purpose. The amount ofis distorted. In order for it to make sense, the sender
communication should, in addition, be at an optimumof the message must also compare the notion with
level.his/her general experience. Again, for the sake of
We refer here to situations where communicationeconomising with words, the message sent with
has a purpose that can be derived from thewords is more generalised than the underlying notion.
organisation's value-creation and goals. The demandsWe call this generalisation. To summarise; a change
on relevance and accuracy in these situations aretakes place in the actual process of 'translating' a
different to situations of a more social kind. Thenotion into words, through deletion, distortion and
demands on communication in a productivity meetinggeneralisation.
are quite different to those of a lunch-break.'ToThe recipient, on the other hand, must then make a
communicate' really means 'to do together'. We needcorresponding 'translation' of the message. He/she
concepts in order to understand what happens whenmust focus on what is most important, and thereby
people communicate. It is a normally accepted viewdelete parts of the information. In order for the
that all communication carries several messagesmessage to pass into the recipient's notional-world, it
concurrently. And that most messages are ambiguousbecomes distorted to a certain extent. Meaning is
and must therefore be interpreted by the receiver.created by association with own experience, and a
For example, not raising issues, or not intervening ingeneralisation takes place. When we know that
an organisation is also a form of communication. Amessages go through a process of deletion, distortion
manager, who is not dealing with problems in an openand generalisation at both the sending and receiving
and forthright manner, could be understood asend, we will realise the importance of making sure
follows: 'You can do just as you like.' 'I'm not takingthat messages are fully understood as the sender's
responsibility here and don't expect you to either.' Or:true intentions. There are many sources of
'It's OK to carry on doing as we are now.'misunderstanding.We can, furthermore, find sources
Man is the only mammal that has developed aof misunderstanding between different cultures.
complicated language. This language is both a blessingVerbal and non-verbal signals have varying significance
and a curse. By means of language, we have thein different cultures. In some cultures, 'yes' is
opportunity of playing strategic games with eachindicated by a nod of the head whilst in others it is
other. (We even play games with ourselves. We sayshown by a shake of the head. In some cultures
to ourselves that we want to do something - andsilence is a virtue, in others an embarrassment. Praise
really mean something quite different.) We canand compliments are a matter of course for some,
pretend, act the part and 'double-communicate' in allbut are regarded as condescension by others. We
situations. Inter-personal reactions and signals aredon't have to cross national borders to find
exchanged to a large extent at a subconscious level.differences in culture. Organisations also have varying
We have this in common to a certain extent withcultures. Silence when delegating responsibilities can, in
many other higher (and some lower) forms of life.some cases, be a clear indication that things will get
This level however contains many categories ofdone. In others it can be an equally clear indication
communication.that disagreement is so fundamental that you can be
Firstly territorial communication. This form ofsure the job will not get done.
communication covers the sharing of such variedWhen dealing with organisations, we try to make
things as property, job responsibilities, expertise,communication as problem solving and efficient as
friendship, money, experiences, order of speaking,possible. We try to make sensible plans and find
etc. All these are real and imagined things that peoplerational solutions to our problems. However, it is
symbolically convert into issues of territoriality, anddifficult to understand organisations if we only
thereby matters of dispute.understand communication at this level. Even the
Next, we have hierarchy-correcting communication. Amost irrational actions, intrigues and power-struggles
good deal of interpersonal signals within organisationscan be camouflaged as well-founded opinions and
serves the purpose of either strengthening oractions. With regard to organisations, our aim is
challenging each individual's place in the hierarchy. Manmainly to achieve as purely rational communication as
creates hierarchies every time groups of any kind arepossible, where solutions and conclusions are based
formed.on sensible, businesslike criteria. In order to achieve
A third group is phatic communication. This refers tothis, it is imperative that the subconscious levels of
signals exchanged between members of the samecommunication function in a positive and conflict-free
species to strengthen the feeling of belonging and tomanner. Perhaps the most important thing of all is the
increase security and confidence. For instance, it isexperience of contact; experiencing good contact is
the custom in most cultures to go through a greetingthe same as feeling understood. That we have
ritual, or a so-called social stage, on meeting. This cansomething in common, speak the same language; are
be an exchange of news about relatives, theon the same wavelength.