Blended Wing Airliner Concept Safety Versus Tube & Wing Airliners Considered

When airliners crash often many people die, andwing design? Could be but, realize the other issue;
depending on the angle of impact sometimes therepeople wish to fly in an aircraft that looks like an
are no survivors, some aerospace engineers believeairplane, and people have come to assume airplanes
the real problem is in the way aircraft are designed,are suppose to look a certain way. Public perception
that is to say fuel inside the belly or fuselage. Theis finicky that way.
long tubular design is also problematic, as it tends toOne issue with the Bernoulli Blended Wing airliner
break apart allowing any fire to fill the fuselage,concept is that it might not be so good for
where the people are with smoke and fuel that is onpassengers, as they have no ability to see out. Still,
fire.this problem could be solved as the top of the cabin
At least one group has claimed that the Burnelli Wingcould and sides could become a flat panel display and
Design is a better because it has the fuel in themerely display a video what's outside on the walls
wings and the engines in the fuselage, meaning theand ceiling, even better than the view of today's
main point for ignition of a fire, the engines areairliners.
separated from the fuel. Conventional airliners, haveNow then, there was an aircraft recently that feel
the fuel in the wings and fuselage, and the enginesshort of the runway in Europe that broke apart, and
on the wing, thus a fire is inevitable once the wingsthat was unfortunate, there were deaths. And you
come apart on impact during a crash.can build a better structure or design than a long
Indeed, I have a few comments about this, in that itskinny tube of tooth paste, with wings on it, but
appears to me that this whole broken fuselage thingthere are also trade offs for other things. In that
might be over played. Remember the Hudson Rivercrash a Bernoulli Design may not have crashed in the
landing, the aircraft stayed intact. Now, there is afirst place and it probably would have broken apart
famous NASA Crash test of an airliner coming aparteither.
and instantly cooking all the "Dummy PassengerStill, in the end all aerospace engineers must agree
Manikins" inside; still, in the NASA crash theythat each aircraft design is a giant compromise of
purposely dipped a wing, as it hit the ground, whichphysics and until we build shape shifting wings, we
made for a spectacular explosion, and when aircraftare going to have to keep trading off. Please
tumbled; well what can you expect?consider all this.
Does this mean that we should switch to the flying