Aircraft Composites Repair Decides the Future

The Commercial Aircraft Composites Repaircomposite or otherwise) using metallic type
Committee CACRCprocesses are the better method if major repairs are
It's task groups cover:required whereas minor damage can be restored
Composites repair materials, composites repairusing bonding techniques.
Techniques, composites inspection, compositesCorrosion at interfaces with metallic components.
design, Facilities Training, Airline Inspection andCorrosion of metallic structures causes the aircraft
composites repair conditionsindustry vast expense in maintenance due to
This work is progressing.inspection, repair or attempts at it's prevention.
It should be remembered that the CACRC is focusedUndoubtedly, one of the main advantages of
on the current in service problems and so is primarilycomposites is the enormous scope for reduction of
concerned with thin components, often sandwichthis burden, however, there will always be metallic
constructions (ref for example SAE AE-27, the 'Guidecomponents on the aircraft and the potential for
for the design of durable, repairable and maintainablecorrosion at the interfaces with carbon must be
aircraft composites' whose design case studies aretaken very seriously. There are already many
mostly sandwich parts). As in service confidence inairframes existing which have completed high flight
composites grows, particularly in lightweight sandwichcycles and many years in service without suffering
panels or adhesive bonded structures used in aircraftsuch damage. Adequate protection schemes exist to
cabin interiors, more composite primary structuresprevent these problems and careful design and
are introduced. Today, for example, we find themaintenance should be sufficient to realise a
Airbus vertical fins and horizontal tailplanes ofsignificant saving in costs. Particular care must be
composite as well as the outer wingboxes oftaken at major interfaces such as an outer to inner
Aerospatiale's ATR72s. However this construction iswingbox joint and the design should allow reasonable
monolithic and generally of a greater thickness thanaccess for inspection.
the secondary structures. Experience has shown thatStripping for aircraft repainting.
these structures are extremely tolerant of in serviceStripping and repainting is a regular maintenance
hazards with the result that any increasedoperation for the airlines either to renew the
unscheduled maintenance costs due to more complexcosmetic appearance, to change the company logo
repair processes (compared to metals) areor due to change of owner. An aircraft is typically
insignificant considering the limited number ofrepainted every 3 - 5 years although it is quite
occurrences. Nevertheless, efforts must be continuedcommon for the wings to be done at every other
to be made to improve the current repair techniques.overhaul. Concerns have been raised that this will be
There is a different emphasis placed on variousmore expensive on a composite wingbox as abrasive
aspects of composites between airlines. For example,methods are required rather than chemical stripping.
the more widespread use of composite primaryThe sophisticated equipment which is required for
structure is very much encouraged by some, otherssuch abrasive methods (dry ice, wheat starch, water
are more cautious. Some customers will carry out alljet, lasers etc) requires a large capital investment
their composite maintenance in-house, others willwhich the operators are reluctant to spend.
outsource it to a third party. Stripping of the paintChemical stripping risks damaging the composite and
concerns some, others not and similarly bonded oris not a practical option at present however research
bolted repair techniques have their supporters.is continuing to develop paints such that the top coat
In service threats to the use of aircraft composites:is easily removed by a mild stripper but the primer
As with most industries, commercial operators areremains in place. Alternative solutions may be resin
subjected to a more and more competitive businesswith colour pigments or adhesive films which can be
environment, one consequence of which is therenewed without paint removal.
intensive utilisation of the aircraft themselves toOpinions about carbon composites within the aircraft
maximise revenue. Aircraft turnaround times of onlyindustry are both positive and negative and are
30 minutes ensures that risks of impact from aircraftbased mainly on components of thin laminates and/or
gse ... catering trucks, passenger stairs, servicesandwich construction. In order to gain in service
trucks, towing vehicles, passenger buses etc areexperience and hence increase confidence in their
ever present. Reliability of the product is therefore ofperformance, they have often been used to replace
paramount importance as any unexpected downtimemetallic secondary structures in locations which are
reflects directly in the profits of the airlines. This hasvulnerable to impact. Consequently damage occurs on
a greater impact than in years gone by, becausea regular basis (as it would with metallics) and repairs
today, a passenger is easily able to take a flight on aare required. Moisture ingress has caused problems
competitor's aircraft. However, maintenance of thewith very thin laminates (typically of 2 plies)
aircraft, be it planned or unplanned, is a cost whichhowever, good design, by specifying a minimum of 3
the operators have to incur in order to keep them inor 4 plies, should provide the solution. It is recognised
an airworthy condition. It is the OEM's responsibility tothat these types of composite parts are more time
understand the working environment of the aircraftconsuming to repair than their metallic equivalents and
so that both the Airworthiness Requirements areso incur higher unplanned maintenance costs. This
met and the maintenance costs of it's products aresituation is made worse due to allowable damage
kept to a minimum. The operator requires a designlimits of composites being conservatively small. These
which is reliable and tolerant of in service threats.drawbacks have been recognised and the aircraft
There are many and varied threats to the aircraft inindustry is working together to improve the situation.
service as they are used in a hostile environment.When thicker composite monolithic laminates are
Threats under consideration area) Impact from tyreemployed however, in service experience is showing
debrisb) Impact from engine debris (both large andthat their tolerance to the in service environment is
small)c) Engine Fired) Lightning Strikee) High Intensityexcellent and if used to manufacture wingboxes, will
Radio Frequenciesf) Local Heating of Structure frombe protected from the majority of impact sources.
Fuel Pump Dry Runningg) Impact from Birdstrikeh)Nonetheless, there will always be the infrequent
Hot air impingement from duct bursti) General impactoccasion when action is required to repair major
(hail, dropped tools, 'hangar rash', refuelling nozzles,damage and the resulting unplanned maintenance cost
runway debris etc)j) General Environmental Effectsmay indeed be higher than it's metallic equivalent.
Despite evidence showing that thick monolithicHowever, when considering the overall expected
laminates are extremely damage tolerant, there willreduction in LCCs to be gained by the operators due
always be the potential requirement for embodying ato advantages in fatigue, corrosion, reduced
major repair.scheduled inspections and fuel burn(and these
There is very little experience at the airlines of majoradvantages are already appreciated by the airlines),
repairs being carried out on thick composite monolithicwe should continue to make positive efforts to
structure where, for example, thicknesses may berealise the potential benefits of composites in large
greater than 1 inch in some areas of an Airbus typescale applications on commercial aircraft. The
wingbox. Whereas thin panels are normally repairedimportance of LCCs is becoming more appreciated by
by bonding, this technique will meet with additionalthe industry generally but we are still in the early
difficulties as the structural thickness grows. Scarfingstages of having the tools available for assessing and
at currently accepted angles will mean that themonitoring them. Consequently, it is difficult to predict
original damaged area may grow significantly in sizeexactly the magnitude of the financial benefits to be
and run into adjacent structural features which willgained due to the replacement of a metallic
complicate the repair process still further. Consistentcomponent by a well engineered composite one.
heat application and consolidation will be difficult unlessThe manufacturers must recognise that their
carried out in multiple lay ups, however, thecustomers will only accept large scale application of
downtime for completing successive cures maycomposite technology if economical benefits can be
become unacceptably long. Finally the assurance ofdemonstrated both on initial purchase price and life
bondline strength is still a question which is oftencycle costs. This is one of the challenges facing the
raised and will have to be answered if applied toOEMs at present and it is their task to fulfil the
wingbox structure which has the additionalrequirement by intelligent design and the correct
complication of being exposed to longterm fuelapplication of the material.
contact. It may be that bolted patches (either