A Short (Unofficial) History of the Air-Ground Digital Link - The Beginning

Introductionthrilled by the prospect.
Talking to a group of young controllers the other dayBut on the industry level the business case was
I suddenly realized that Controller Pilot Digital Linkwater tight and it was explained to the nay-sayers
Communications (CPDLC) and its enabler, air/groundthat they too would benefit if capacity was not
digital link were a kind of given for them... Theirrestricted because of communications issues.
centre has either already implemented it or had plansOf course reservations remained. These were tied
for it and while their opinion diverged on themore than anything to the bitter experience with
usefulness of the thing, they certainly did notFANS where the reluctance of the ground to equip
consider it as anything exciting. In a way this is good.negated the benefits... Airlines insisted that any
The more everyday air/ground digital link becomes,continental data link solution must make sure that the
the more we can consider having cleared a majorground leads, period.
hurdle in implementing an important capacity enabler.The war of technologies
But not being familiar with the history of a particularWhile experts were already working on the kind of
development reduces our ability to understand itsmessages that would be needed for CPDLC, on the
shortcomings and its future potential.technology side the mother of all wars broke lose.
With this article I would like to put on the table aThere was of course FANS 1 from Boeing (and its
few, sometimes amusing, sometimes incredible,Airbus equivalent FANS A) and some thought this
details from the last 15 years of so about air/groundshould be made prevalent everywhere... Unfortunately
digital link development in the hope that it will bethere were a number of shortcomings both from a
provide some insight into what is after all a verytechnical and price perspective that made FANS less
exciting development in air traffic management.than ideal as a solution for continental airspace. Even
The story will not be comprehensive; it is only amore unfortunately, repairing FANS to eliminate the
summary and is based mainly on my recollections. Ishortcomings was not an easy task and was
was pretty close to the fire but possibly for thattherefore not even considered for a time. But it did
very reason I may have seen things in a light thatnot prevent Boeing from pushing FANS at every
was colored differently from the actual reality. If youopportunity until they realized that the whole effort
have better information, do comment on my versionwas becoming counter productive...
of the tale.The war of technologies was being fought on two
The original double driverslevels: the Aeronautical Telecommunications Network
Work on digital link use in continental airspace was(ATN) versus Internet Protocol (IP) on the one hand
triggered by two concerns, both having to do withand between the VHF Digital Link (VDL) modes on
radio frequency congestion. On the one hand,the other.
experts calculated that with the forecast trafficThe war between ATN and IP was the least bloody.
growth, sector frequencies would reach saturation,ATN is an ICAO standard and it took slightly more
preventing controllers from communicating with thethan forever to get agreed and standardized with
aircraft under their control in a timely fashion. Makingthe blessing of ICAO. When work on ATN started, IP
sectors smaller was not an option as their minimumwas not even a gleam in engineers' eyes and in the
size would have been reached earlier as dictated byend ATN won not because it is so superior but
traffic growth. Only an alternative communicationbecause it was there in a standardized form and not
means could offer a solution.many felt the strength back then to start the same
At about the same time, concerns arose about theeffort on IP.
possible forthcoming congestion on the ACARSThe VDL modes were another story. There, for a
frequencies, basically promising to paralyze this vitaltime, it looked like the US and Europe might end up
tool of airline operations. There again an alternativewith different and mutually incompatible systems that
solution was apparently needed.would have been a costly disaster for airliners
In the 1980s and early 1990s it was not easy tooperating on both continents.
argue for starting serious work on air/ground digitalThe clash of 8.33 kHz channel spacing and VDL Mode
link implementation. Part of the problem arose from3
what should have been a big help... but it was not.Although always claimed by the airspace users and
Seeing all the air traffic management problems in thenever officially admitted by European States, the
world, Boeing pushed ahead with the airbornearchaic and inefficient management of frequencies
element of FANS, the Future Air Navigation System,was leading to a situation where new sectors being
which looked extremely promising except for oneopened to increase capacity would no longer be able
thing. Nobody on the ground took any notice withto have their own frequency because there simply
the result that hundreds of aircraft were flying overwould be none left in the aviation spectrum with its
the world's oceans with CNS capabilities that made25 kHz channel spacing.
the existing oceanic separation minima obsolete butFor some in the industry it was becoming clear that
still had to continue with them because the ATMthe whole VHF radio system used by aviation was
providers on the ground balked at introducing theoutdated, inefficient and a blocking factor to the
changes that would have made them able to use theintroduction of new capacity enablers of which the
new capabilities.absolute shortage of frequencies was just one
FANS was a bit like the FMS... the aircraft capabilityelement. It was high time to devise something new.
being light years ahead of the ground systems withSomething future proof, something that would serve
the ground systems hardly moving at all.aviation for many years to come... Of course this
In continental airspace, the situation was different.would have cost money but then there is no such
FANS was normally not installed on short and mediumthing as a free lunch...
range aircraft while they faced the specter of ATCInstead of taking the rational decision to force the
and ACARS frequency congestion, something thatdevelopment of a new communications system, the
was not an issue (in this form) over the oceans.ICAO Special European Regional Air Navigation
ACARS has always been an air/ground digital linkmeeting (EUR RAN) in September 1994 decided to
system, albeit of modest bandwidth and reserved forsplit the channel spacing in Europe to 8.33 kHz,
airline communications. Also the alternative means ofthereby increasing the number of available channels.
communication for ATC has been identified as airReplacing radios appeared to be the cheaper option in
ground digital link with a set of new messages thatthe short term...
would enable the controller to "talk" to aircraft evenIn the United States where there has never been a
in the most congested situations. The previouslyshortage of frequencies (although the demand for
strictly sequential method of voice communicationsfrequencies is not smaller than in Europe) and 8.33
could be replaced by the basically parallel method ofkHz was never considered seriously initially.
digital link with the added bonus of enabling severalNevertheless, they too realized that a new
members of the sector team to talk to aircraftcommunications system would be needed and they
without jinxing the system.promoted VDL Mode 3. This system would be able
The idea was, and still is, to remove the capacityto handle both digital voice and digital messages. In
constraint represented by the limited ability of theother words, VDL Mode 3 would offer a seamless
controller to talk to the many aircraft otherwise ableservice where a controller could talk or send text
to operate in his sector.messages, depending on the prevailing operational
Business case hurdlesneeds.
It is well known that, safety issues apart, airlines willFor a time the map of the world seemed to have
only bolt anything on their aircraft if there is a clearbeen fatally split. What has never happened in the
business case for doing so or if it is mandated. Thepast, no ILS or VOR being different on different
real chance of ATC frequencies becoming totallycontinents was becoming the nightmarish reality on
jumbled was still far enough in the future to bethe threshold of a major ATM "improvement".
considered a real driver and hence it was provingAircraft would be required to carry voice radios with
very difficult to make a business case for ATC digital8.33 kHz capability as well as VDL Mode 3 radios plus
link on its own... In the end, the ACARS problem firstwhatever Europe would come up with as the
brought to the table by Lufthansa saved the day.technology for air/ground digital link... Pilots would also
Combining the ACARS "replacement" with theneed to figure out when to use what...
elements needed for ATC digital link was able toIn the end, the implementation of VDL Mode 3 fell
deliver a compelling business case on the industrybehind schedule and the danger receded... As we will
level. Of course, general digital link usage was notsee in the next section, at the end of one more
something smaller airlines took for granted... thosemajor battle a single solution remained and that
without ACARS saw only one side of the equation,became the de facto world-wide standard.
namely the costs and they were not particularly