Iraq and Afghanistan: Staying Until the Fight is Over

The Armed Forces Press Service recently quotedsupport for the war effort had been "tepid." In fact,
Army Chief of Staff General Peter J. Schoomaker ashe said, only 4% of the nation's gross national
saying that the current level of soldiers in Iraq couldproduct had been committed to defense, compared
remain constant through 2010. Naturally, this soundedwith 38% of GNP during the Second World War.
alarms in the mainstream media, which had been"Ultimately, victory requires a national consensus...in
reporting for some time that the Army planned towords and actions," he said. "Another 9/11 should not
reduce troop levels significantly during late 2006 andhave to occur to shake us into action."While politicians
into 2007.There are two important things to noteand the public alike complain about the money being
here. The first is pretty straightforward: troop levelsspent in the two war zones, a figure quoted at over
are constantly adjusted to meet the conditions on$1 billion per week, military members across the
the ground. When the level of violence dipped in Iraq,country are cutting back on nonessential
the commanders on the ground reduced the numberexpenditures so that every available dollar can be
of troops in the country to just over 100,000 andused in support of the men and women on the
talked about further possible reductions. As the levelground in Afghanistan and Iraq.On military posts
of violence steadily increased this year, though, troopthroughout America, quality of life projects and family
levels again went up, with some deploymentssupport programs are cutting back to free
accelerated and some re-deployments delayed. Thedesperately needed funds for the war effort. The
same held true in Afghanistan, where NATOvery people who volunteer to sacrifice so much for
countries were called upon to increase troop levels inthe rest of us are bearing the entire burden of the
response to increased Taliban activity in the southernWar on Terror while average citizens complain about
part of the country.The point is that there is nogas prices or discuss Madonna's adoption of a child
magic formula for the number of soldiers on thefrom Malawi. As General Schoomaker said, providing
ground. Troop levels rise or fall in direct proportion tothe military with the funds it needs "...is a matter of
the levels of violence in Iraq and Afghanistan. Callsnational priority, not a matter of affordability."Most
for massive troop reductions ignore the realities inAmericans don't equate the War on Terror with
both countries. The fight is far from over andWorld War II. The fight against the Axis in the 1940s
Afghanistan and Iraq could easily be lost if ourwas viewed as a fight for survival requiring the
resolve wavers.The second thing to note is a bitsupport of the entire country. Americans need to
more conceptual and thus more difficult for people tounderstand that we are again locked in a
understand: we are an Army (and Navy, and Airlife-and-death struggle with a radical ideology bent on
Force, and Marine Corps) at war, but we are not aour subjugation and eventual destruction.Americans
nation at war. What I mean by this is that everydayaccept Afghanistan because they can link the Taliban
Americans go about their lives largely unaffected byand Osama bin Laden to the attacks of 9/11. Iraq
the carnage in Iraq and Afghanistan. The vastmay or may not have been a front in the Global War
majority of the population doesn't serve in theon Terror in March 2003. Intelligent people can debate
military and only a small number of people even knowthat topic equally well from both points of view. But
someone in the service, much less in the two primarythere is no question that Iraq has now joined
theaters of the war on terror.Everything they knowAfghanistan as a central battleground in the fight
about Baghdad, Fallujah, Ramadi, Kandahar, Bagram,against radical Islam. Jihadists from across the globe
and any number of other key battlegrounds ishave flocked to Iraq to wage war on the United
obtained from their nightly news broadcasts and localStates and the west.Secretary of Defense Donald
papers.The soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marinesRumsfeld said in an October 16 speech that "There's
currently forward deployed understand what theyno way the United States can lose militarily against
are involved in. They risk their lives everyday whilethe terrorists, but the center of gravity of the war in
we argue over "stay the course" and "cut and run."Iraq is not in Iraq, it's in Washington, D.C."If we pull
Unlike World War II, when the entire nation wasout of Iraq now, our enemies will be emboldened. If
engaged in the war effort against Germany andwe leave before the job is done, we will breathe
Japan, the Global War on Terror is witness to anew life into the cause of Muslim fundamentalists,
select few volunteers putting everything on the linemuch as the Soviet Union did when it pulled out of
while the rest of us go about our daily routines inAfghanistan in 1989. The calls for troop withdrawals
ignorant bliss.This attitude concerns Generalmust be resisted, and we must stay until the fight is
Schoomaker. In a recent speech to soldiers andover.
defense industry representatives he warned that