One of the best fighter planes:the YAK
 

Welcome to our Yak ARchive. Have fun browsing!

 

Article #5: Rebuilding the U.S.-Russia Relationship

(Browse for more articles)

 
Among the most important foreign policy The history of humanity certainly has
priorities likely to face the next U.S. gone through unipolar periods and seen
President will be the task of rebuilding aspirations to world supremacy. And what
the eroding U.S.-Russia relationship. hasn't happened in world history?
Russia is currently engaged in a policy However, what is a unipolar world?
of employing its diplomatic leverage to ...It is [a] world in which there is one
"counterbalance" the United States. In master, one sovereign. And at the end of
the future, if the diminishing the day this is pernicious not only for
relationship is not repaired, Russia all those within this system, but also
could well begin to put its hard power for the sovereign itself because it
into play, as well. Such a development destroys itself from within...
would diminish the United States' ability I consider that the unipolar model is not
to safeguard and advance its critical only unacceptable but also impossible in
global interests at a time when it has today's world. And this is not only
suffered a major loss of credibility at because if there was individual
enormous cost in the wake of its decision leadership in today's-and precisely in
to go to war in Iraq. The challenge of today's-world, then the military,
bringing about an improved relationship political and economic resources would
is still a manageable one. However, if not suffice. What is even more important
the United States is to have a reasonable is that the model itself is flawed
chance at success, it will need to because at its basis there is and can be
understand Russia's concerns with regard no moral foundations for modern
to American unilateralism and make civilization.
appropriate policy changes that limit its Along with this, what is happening in
unilateralism to situations where today's world...is a tentative to
unilateralist approaches are truly introduce precisely this concept into
necessary. international affairs, the concept of a
In the post-Cold War world, fears the unipolar world.
consequences of state failure and And with which results?
instability on its expansive frontier. Unilateral and frequently illegitimate
Clifford Gaddy and Fiona Hill of The actions have not resolved any problems.
Brookings Institution explained, "Given Moreover they have caused new human
its location in a volatile neighborhood tragedies and created new centers of
encompassing Central Asia, the Middle tension. Judge for yourselves: wars as
East and Northeast Asia, and including well as local and regional conflicts have
several states on a potential collision not diminished...
course with the United States-Iraq, Iran, Today we are witnessing an almost
China, and North Korea-Russia is uncontained hyper use of force-military
extremely vulnerable to the unintended force-in international relations, force
consequences of U.S. action. A that is plunging the world into an abyss
unilateralist approach on the part of the of permanent conflicts. As a result we do
United States, Putin believes could prove not have sufficient strength to find a
disastrous for Russia." comprehensive solution to any one of
The still fairly recent and aggressive these conflicts Finding a political
turn to unilateralism by the United settlement also becomes impossible.
States was driven by perceptions of a new Putin explicitly blamed the United States
global reality that followed the end of for such developments. "One state and, of
the Cold War. When the Cold War course, first and foremost the United
concluded, the Soviet Union was in the States, has overstepped its national
last days of its life (soon afterward, it borders in every way," he charged, "This
fractured into a number of economically is visible in the economic, political,
and politically weak successor states). cultural and educational policies it
At that time, the U.S. appeared to have imposes on other nations." A
gained primacy in world affairs, full-fledged rupture in U.S.-Russia
especially in the eyes of an emerging relations is still avoidable. In fact,
Neoconservative school of foreign policy the relationship can still be repaired
thought that was beginning to diverge fairly easily, as unilateralism, and not
from the pragmatic Realism that had a clash of critical interests between the
predominated through the end of the Cold two nations, is at the root of the
War. In their view, a "multipolar" world worsening relationship. A pragmatic,
had been replaced by a "Unipolar" one. interest-driven U.S. foreign policy that
"The center of world power is an restores primacy to diplomacy, eliminates
unchallenged superpower, the United idealistic "Regime Change," and returns
States, attended by its Western allies," emphasis to relations between allies and
leading Neoconservative thinker Charles great powers can overturn the
Krauthammer wrote. He added, "There is unilateralism that is currently harming
today no lack of second-rank powers. the relationship. Specifically, such a
Germany and Japan are economic dynamos. policy would entail among the following
Britain and France can deploy diplomatic features:
and to some extent military assets. The - A negotiated energy pact in which the
Soviet Union possesses several elements United States and Russia would ensure
of power-military, diplomatic and cooperation with regard to Central Asia's
political-but all are in rapid decline. energy resources and bring an end to the
There is but one first-rate power and no emerging energy rivalry now evolving. In
prospect in the immediate future of any the partnership, both nations would
power to rival it." The Soviet Union, embrace the principle of open access and
according to Krauthammer, had become collaborate to address issues that might
nothing more than a "second-rank" power arise. Neither would make unilateral
and one that was in "rapid decline" to decisions that would undermine the core
boot. interests of the other.
Russia was humiliated. At the same time, - Full support for Russia's fight against
it was constrained by its major weakness. terrorism in its semi-autonomous Chechen
Emboldened by the march of world events, region and elimination of demands that
Neoconservative thinkers believed that Russia to negotiate with the Chechen
the new "Unipolar" world made U.S. terrorists. Such calls are unreasonable
consideration of the major interests of and have angered Russia's government. In
the world's other great powers relatively the aftermath of the Beslan
less important than in it was past. Under massacre-Russia's 9/11-Putin blasted U.S.
such an assumption, they advocated an calls for negotiations angrily
increasingly assertive unilateral exclaiming, "Why don't you meet Osama Bin
approach to U.S. foreign policy toward Laden, invite him to Brussels or to the
creating a safer world. White House and engage in talks..."
In stark contrast, Russia saw - Full NATO membership and
unilateralism as hazardous to responsibilities and authority within the
international peace and security. Today, relationship that would be commensurate
Russia continues to believe that with its role as a great power. Until
single-power hegemony and a unilateralist that happens, no missiles or missile
approach to foreign policy are dangerous defense systems would be placed in
and destabilizing. Consequently, it views countries that constitute Russia's "Near
U.S. unilateralism as posing a threat to Abroad." The existing NATO guarantee of
its critical interests and wellbeing. collective security would be maintained.
Toward that end, Russian President At the same time, Russia would commit to
Vladimir Putin has consistently spoken working with the U.S. and NATO to help
out on those issues. On May 8, 2001, he mitigate missile threats or, if
declared that "claims to world necessary, help contain the countries
domination...still are the cause of many against which the anti-missile system is
wars" and that "these sorts of claims intended to afford protection.
still linger on today and this is very - A free trade agreement to more closely
dangerous." A day later, he added, "Our integrate Russia into the global and
entire post-war [post-World War II] western economies. Such a mutually
history teaches us that no country can beneficial interdependence could mitigate
build a safer world for itself alone, and Russian "counterbalancing."
even more so, cannot build its security - Restoration of a military doctrine of
to the detriment of others." pre-emption as opposed to proactive war.
Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, a Proactive war, particularly in the
wholly Neoconservative approach to absence of a credible and imminent threat
foreign policy blossomed in the U.S. to nation's critical interests,
Unilateralism became arguably the major undermines respect for the norms of
means by which the U.S. conducted its international law and increases
relations with the international instability in the region in which such
community. "Regime Change" replaced conflicts occur. Application of military
"Containment" and "proactive war" force before diplomacy has been exhausted
replaced "pre-emption." In June 2002, the makes it more difficult for nation's to
U.S. withdrew from the ABM Treaty. In achieve differences in the diplomatic
March 2003, it invaded Iraq in the face arena, as countries would more than
of strong Russian opposition and in the likely focus on deterring an attack that
absence of a United Nations Security could occur before meaningful
Council resolution. Currently, it is negotiations had a chance to find
pursuing plans to place 10 missile agreement.
interceptors in Poland and a radar system None of these policies would compromise
in the Czech Republic to construct a critical U.S. interests. None of these
limited missile defense shield against policies would harm to U.S. national
countries such as Iran. Russian alarm security. Instead, they would create a
grew. post-unilateralist framework under which
On February 10, 2007, President Putin the geopolitically important U.S.-Russia
made a seminal speech that detailed his relationship could be renewed and
objections to the Neoconservatives' improved. Such a development would be
"Unipolar" vision and U.S. mutually-beneficial to both countries and
uniltateralism. Excerpts from Putin's could, over time, be a force for
speech at the Munich Conference on increased stability in parts of the world
Security Policy detail his views and where stability is currently difficult to
follow: achieve.






1 - A - B - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - 45 - 46 - 47 - 48 - 49 - 50 - 51 -