One of the best fighter planesthe YAK


Rebuilding the U.S.-Russia Relationship

Among the most important foreign policy
priorities likely to face the next U.S....It is [a] world in which there is one
President will be the task of rebuilding themaster, one sovereign. And at the end of the
eroding U.S.-Russia relationship. Russia isday this is pernicious not only for all those
currently engaged in a policy of employingwithin this system, but also for the
its diplomatic leverage to "counterbalance"sovereign itself because it destroys itself
the United States. In the future, if thefrom  within...
diminishing relationship is not repaired,
Russia could well begin to put its hard powerI consider that the unipolar model is not
into play, as well. Such a development wouldonly unacceptable but also impossible in
diminish the United States' ability totoday's world. And this is not only because
safeguard and advance its critical globalif there was individual leadership in
interests at a time when it has suffered atoday's-and precisely in today's-world, then
major loss of credibility at enormous cost inthe military, political and economic
the wake of its decision to go to war inresources would not suffice. What is even
Iraq. The challenge of bringing about anmore important is that the model itself is
improved relationship is still a manageableflawed because at its basis there is and can
one. However, if the United States is to havebe no moral foundations for modern
a reasonable chance at success, it will needcivilization.
to understand Russia's concerns with regard
to American unilateralism and makeAlong with this, what is happening in today's
appropriate policy changes that limit itsworld...is a tentative to introduce precisely
unilateralism to situations wherethis concept into international affairs, the
unilateralist approaches are truly necessary.concept  of  a  unipolar  world.
In the post-Cold War world, fears theAnd  with  which  results?
consequences of state failure and instability
on its expansive frontier. Clifford Gaddy andUnilateral and frequently illegitimate
Fiona Hill of The Brookings Institutionactions have not resolved any problems.
explained, "Given its location in a volatileMoreover they have caused new human tragedies
neighborhood encompassing Central Asia, theand created new centers of tension. Judge for
Middle East and Northeast Asia, and includingyourselves: wars as well as local and
several states on a potential collisionregional  conflicts  have  not  diminished...
course with the United States-Iraq, Iran,
China, and North Korea-Russia is extremelyToday we are witnessing an almost uncontained
vulnerable to the unintended consequences ofhyper use of force-military force-in
U.S. action. A unilateralist approach on theinternational relations, force that is
part of the United States, Putin believesplunging the world into an abyss of permanent
could  prove  disastrous  for  Russia."conflicts. As a result we do not have
sufficient strength to find a comprehensive
The still fairly recent and aggressive turnsolution to any one of these conflicts
to unilateralism by the United States wasFinding a political settlement also becomes
driven by perceptions of a new global realityimpossible.
that followed the end of the Cold War. When
the Cold War concluded, the Soviet Union wasPutin explicitly blamed the United States for
in the last days of its life (soon afterward,such developments. "One state and, of course,
it fractured into a number of economicallyfirst and foremost the United States, has
and politically weak successor states). Atoverstepped its national borders in every
that time, the U.S. appeared to have gainedway," he charged, "This is visible in the
primacy in world affairs, especially in theeconomic, political, cultural and educational
eyes of an emerging Neoconservative school ofpolicies it imposes on other nations." A
foreign policy thought that was beginning tofull-fledged rupture in U.S.-Russia relations
diverge from the pragmatic Realism that hadis still avoidable. In fact, the relationship
predominated through the end of the Cold War.can still be repaired fairly easily, as
In their view, a "multipolar" world had beenunilateralism, and not a clash of critical
replaced by a "Unipolar" one. "The centerinterests between the two nations, is at the
of world power is an unchallenged superpower,root of the worsening relationship. A
the United States, attended by its Westernpragmatic, interest-driven U.S. foreign
allies," leading Neoconservative thinkerpolicy that restores primacy to diplomacy,
Charles Krauthammer wrote. He added, "Thereeliminates idealistic "Regime Change," and
is today no lack of second-rank powers.returns emphasis to relations between allies
Germany and Japan are economic dynamos.and great powers can overturn the
Britain and France can deploy diplomatic andunilateralism that is currently harming the
to some extent military assets. The Sovietrelationship. Specifically, such a policy
Union possesses several elements ofwould  entail  among  the following features:
power-military, diplomatic and political-but
all are in rapid decline. There is but one- A negotiated energy pact in which the
first-rate power and no prospect in theUnited States and Russia would ensure
immediate future of any power to rival it."cooperation with regard to Central Asia's
The Soviet Union, according to Krauthammer,energy resources and bring an end to the
had become nothing more than a "second-rank"emerging energy rivalry now evolving. In the
power and one that was in "rapid decline" topartnership, both nations would embrace the
boot.principle of open access and collaborate to
address issues that might arise. Neither
Russia was humiliated. At the same time, itwould make unilateral decisions that would
was constrained by its major weakness.undermine  the  core  interests of the other.
Emboldened by the march of world events,
Neoconservative thinkers believed that the- Full support for Russia's fight against
new "Unipolar" world made U.S. considerationterrorism in its semi-autonomous Chechen
of the major interests of the world's otherregion and elimination of demands that Russia
great powers relatively less important thanto negotiate with the Chechen terrorists.
in it was past. Under such an assumption,Such calls are unreasonable and have angered
they advocated an increasingly assertiveRussia's government. In the aftermath of the
unilateral approach to U.S. foreign policyBeslan massacre-Russia's 9/11-Putin blasted
toward  creating  a  safer  world.U.S. calls for negotiations angrily
exclaiming, "Why don't you meet Osama Bin
In stark contrast, Russia saw unilateralismLaden, invite him to Brussels or to the White
as hazardous to international peace andHouse  and  engage  in  talks..."
security. Today, Russia continues to believe
that single-power hegemony and a- Full NATO membership and responsibilities
unilateralist approach to foreign policy areand authority within the relationship that
dangerous and destabilizing. Consequently, itwould be commensurate with its role as a
views U.S. unilateralism as posing a threatgreat power. Until that happens, no missiles
to  its  critical  interests  and  wellbeing.or missile defense systems would be placed in
countries that constitute Russia's "Near
Toward that end, Russian President VladimirAbroad." The existing NATO guarantee of
Putin has consistently spoken out on thosecollective security would be maintained. At
issues. On May 8, 2001, he declared thatthe same time, Russia would commit to working
"claims to world domination...still are thewith the U.S. and NATO to help mitigate
cause of many wars" and that "these sorts ofmissile threats or, if necessary, help
claims still linger on today and this is verycontain the countries against which the
dangerous." A day later, he added, "Ouranti-missile system is intended to afford
entire post-war [post-World War II] historyprotection.
teaches us that no country can build a safer
world for itself alone, and even more so,- A free trade agreement to more closely
cannot build its security to the detriment ofintegrate Russia into the global and western
others."economies. Such a mutually beneficial
interdependence could mitigate Russian
Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, a"counterbalancing."
wholly Neoconservative approach to foreign
policy blossomed in the U.S. Unilateralism- Restoration of a military doctrine of
became arguably the major means by which thepre-emption as opposed to proactive war.
U.S. conducted its relations with theProactive war, particularly in the absence of
international community. "Regime Change"a credible and imminent threat to nation's
replaced "Containment" and "proactive war"critical interests, undermines respect for
replaced "pre-emption." In June 2002, thethe norms of international law and increases
U.S. withdrew from the ABM Treaty. In Marchinstability in the region in which such
2003, it invaded Iraq in the face of strongconflicts occur. Application of military
Russian opposition and in the absence of aforce before diplomacy has been exhausted
United Nations Security Council resolution.makes it more difficult for nation's to
Currently, it is pursuing plans to place 10achieve differences in the diplomatic arena,
missile interceptors in Poland and a radaras countries would more than likely focus on
system in the Czech Republic to construct adeterring an attack that could occur before
limited missile defense shield againstmeaningful negotiations had a chance to find
countries  such  as Iran. Russian alarm grew.agreement.
On February 10, 2007, President Putin made aNone of these policies would compromise
seminal speech that detailed his objectionscritical U.S. interests. None of these
to the Neoconservatives' "Unipolar" visionpolicies would harm to U.S. national
and U.S. uniltateralism. Excerpts fromsecurity. Instead, they would create a
Putin's speech at the Munich Conference onpost-unilateralist framework under which the
Security  Policy detail his views and follow:geopolitically important U.S.-Russia
relationship could be renewed and improved.
The history of humanity certainly has goneSuch a development would be
through unipolar periods and seen aspirationsmutually-beneficial to both countries and
to world supremacy. And what hasn't happenedcould, over time, be a force for increased
in  world  history?stability in parts of the world where
stability is currently difficult to achieve.
However,  what  is  a  unipolar  world?



1 A 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76