One of the best fighter planesthe YAK


yak-54.com keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

Flight Simulator 2004 Aircraft PLANES FS2004
FREE planes for FS2004 Used Ultralight Aircraft Sale
Yak 54  

Abracadabra-airborne Rearming

The technology for rearming aircraft withrespects to airborne refueling, with a number
weapons in midair might soon be a reality.of notable modifications. Far Technologies'
This revolutionary technology would enablesystem comprises a rearming plane (a C-130,
combat missions, currently requiring dozensC-130c, C-17, or even a C-5) with an internal
of aircraft, to be performed by very few, andbomb storage area and loading device
to carry out numerous missions by unmannedconsisting of a large aft door with a
combat aircraft without returning to base.modified remote-driven robotic arm (boom)
Airborne rearming might prove to be asequipped with a day-night camera as well as
significant as the airborne refuelingsensors, and, on the attack aircraft, a
revolution  that occurred half a century ago.special smart pylon to receive the arms from
the boom. Each C-130c would be able to carry
KB-29M performing mid-air refuling (Credit:a payload of up to sixteen 2,000 lb (907 kg)
U.S.  Air  Force  Museum)bombs (such as an MK-84), while larger
aircraft would easily be able to rearm a full
In 1921, Alexander P. de Seversky, a Russiansquadron of planes (A C-17 could potentially
pilot who immigrated to the U.S., was thecarry up to seventy MK-84s and a C-5, around
first to apply for and receive a patent for100).
midair refueling. Two years later, the U.S.
army began operational testing of midairRearming  mechanism
refueling, but although successful, another
decade passed before the necessary technologyAt present, manned attack missions may take
and technique were perfected and midairup to several hours, and most of this time is
refueling became routine. World War IIspent flying to and from the target. By
witnessed an even greater improvement in theemploying a refueling and rearming aircraft
field of midair refueling technology, but thepositioned 50 to 150 miles from the target,
increase in internal aircraft fuel capacitiesthe efficiency of an air strike could be
reduced the need for this technology at thedoubled with only a slight increase in time
time. With the introduction of "fuel-hungry"and flight distance. While manned aircraft
jet-powered bombers in the post-war years,could benefit from airborne rearming in
the requirement for aerial refueling becamecertain scenarios, unmanned combat air
apparent once again. Since existing refuelingvehicles (UCAVs) currently under development
methods proved inadequate for refueling jetcould theoretically gain much more from such
bombers, the Boeing Company began testing thea technology. Unlike manned aircraft, UCAVs
"Boeing boom" system, in which a wide pipecan currently stay aloft for days, and in the
connected to the rear of a modified B-29future, weeks or even months at a time,
fitted with small wings, was lowered andperforming countless refueling and rearming
"flown" to a connector on the receiverrounds. Such a capability does not yet exist
aircraft. This new system permitted theand would require some level of automatic
transfer of over six-times as much fuel peroperation, similar to that currently under
minute and since the 1950's, furtherdevelopment for aerial refueling; if
improvements to the boom system havesuccessful, however, it would dramatically
increased its efficiency and safety. Butincrease the flexibility of air power
although computers and a variety of sensorsutilization  in  future  conflicts.
were integrated in recent years, the
refueling system remains humanly-operated.A comprehensive study, conducted by Professor
Several companies world-wide are developingAsher Tishler from Tel Aviv University, on
automatic technologies for aerial refueling,the logistical, economic, and operational
designed to further increase the safety ofaspects of ABRA outlined a number of benefits
this  complex  procedure.over conventional rearming: (1) the number of
bombs delivered in a given time frame could
Whereas aerial refueling increases the rangebe quadrupled in certain situations, (2) a
of an aircraft almost indefinitely, bombersgreat cost reduction would be incurred, due
still must return to base for rearming asto the reduction in the number of aircraft
they are limited in the amount of weaponsneeded to perform each mission, (3) an
they carry. However, when the target isoperational capability could be maintained
situated hundreds of miles away from aeven while airfields and carriers are under
friendly base, precious time and resourcesattack, (4) a reduction in aircraft response
are lost on flights to base for rearming.time whenever a new target is located, and,
Furthermore, in some cases the politicalalthough not explicitly mentioned in
situation precludes the use of friendlyTishler's report, (5) the potential for
military  bases  near  the operating theater.aerial conquest, in which an aircraft
(typically a UAV or UCAV) occupies a specific
Bombs  inside  a  rearming  planearea of the enemy's airspace and maintains it
for an unlimited period to observe enemy
To resolve these problems, the Israelimovements and eliminate all relevant targets
company Far Technologies developed thein  that  area.
Airborne Rearming System (ABRA; currently
patent pending) in conjunction with theTFOT recently interviewed Nir Padan, CEO of
Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI) engineeringFar Technologies as well as a distinguished
group that conducted preliminary systemIsraeli test pilot, who elaborated on ABRA ca
design. The ABRA concept is similar in manydabra.



1 A 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76